What is WCAG
Updated . A 9 minute read.

Scroll sideways to see every column.
| Version | Became a W3C Recommendation | Success criteria | Needed for Level AA | Who points to it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCAG 2.0 | 11 December 2008 | 61 (25 A, 13 AA, 23 AAA) | 38 | The Section 508 Standards for federal agencies, and the 508 edition of the VPAT® |
| WCAG 2.1 | 5 June 2018 (current edition 6 May 2025) | 78 (30 A, 20 AA, 28 AAA) | 50 | DOJ's ADA Title II rule for state and local governments, and the EU edition of the VPAT® |
| WCAG 2.2 | 5 October 2023 (current edition 12 December 2024) | 86 (31 A, 24 AA, 31 AAA) | 55 | W3C, which advises using it; it is also the ISO standard ISO/IEC 40500:2025 |
| WCAG 3 | Not a standard. Latest Working Draft 10 September 2026 | Still being written | None yet | No one yet. W3C says it is a few years from being finished |
Counts are success criteria in each version's W3C text. The 2.0 and 2.1 counts include 4.1.1 Parsing, which WCAG 2.2 removed. Apart from that one, each newer version keeps the older criteria and adds to them, and W3C says content that conforms to 2.2 also conforms to 2.1 and 2.0.
What WCAG is, in one paragraph
WCAG, the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, is the technical standard for making websites usable by people with disabilities. It is written by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), the web's main standards body, through a working group of its Web Accessibility Initiative. W3C's stated aim is a single shared standard for individuals, organisations and governments everywhere, and it is the yardstick that US rules, procurement contracts and audit reports point to.
It is a technical document, not a law and not a beginner's guide. It sets testable rules, called success criteria, for the text, images, sounds and code of a page. Whether you must meet it, and which version, depends on who you answer to, which is the part people mix up; that is covered below under Level AA. The same rules can be applied to PDFs and other documents too, as how to make a PDF accessible shows.
The four principles: perceivable, operable, understandable, robust
Everything in WCAG 2.2 hangs from four principles, often shortened to POUR. Under them sit 13 guidelines, and under the guidelines sit the success criteria, the only part you are tested on. The principles are the quickest way to see what the standard cares about: whether people can take in the content, use it, understand it, and reach it through the tools they rely on.
Scroll sideways to see every column.
| Principle | W3C's wording | Guidelines | In plain words |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perceivable20 A and AA criteria | Information and user interface components must be presentable to users in ways they can perceive. |
| People can take in everything you show, whatever sense they use: alt text, captions, structure, contrast. |
| Operable20 A and AA criteria | User interface components and navigation must be operable. |
| Everything works from a keyboard, with time to act, nothing that flashes, and a way to find your place. |
| Understandable13 A and AA criteria | Information and the operation of the user interface must be understandable. |
| The page states its language, behaves the way people expect, and forms help people fix mistakes. |
| Robust2 A and AA criteria | Content must be robust enough that it can be interpreted by a wide variety of user agents, including assistive technologies. |
| Controls carry a name and role in the code, so screen readers and other tools can read them. |
The counts show where the work sits for a small business site. Perceivable and operable carry 40 of the 55 Level A and AA criteria between them, and most of the problems owners fix first live there: missing alt text, low contrast, menus that a keyboard cannot open. Robust carries two, but they matter to every custom button and pop-up on the page.

Levels A, AA and AAA
Every success criterion has a level. The levels stack: Level AA means meeting every A criterion and every AA criterion, 55 in WCAG 2.2, and Level AAA means meeting all three sets. W3C itself does not recommend requiring AAA for a whole site, because some content cannot meet it.
A
31 criteria in WCAG 2.2
The basics: alt text on images (1.1.1), everything usable from a keyboard (2.1.1), captions on recorded video (1.2.2).
AA
24 criteria in WCAG 2.2
Adds text contrast of 4.5:1 (1.4.3), text that resizes to 200% (1.4.4), a visible keyboard focus (2.4.7), captions on live video (1.2.4).
AAA
31 criteria in WCAG 2.2
The strictest: contrast of 7:1 (1.4.6), extended audio description (1.2.7). W3C does not recommend requiring it for whole sites.
Two rules in the conformance section surprise owners. Conformance is judged on full pages: a page with one inaccessible widget does not conform, even if the rest is perfect. And WCAG does not require you to claim anything; a claim, if you make one, has to give its date, the WCAG version and level, and the pages it covers.
Success criteria, techniques and the Understanding pages
Search for any WCAG rule and you land on one of five W3C documents. Only one of them is the standard. The rest explain it, and W3C is explicit that they are informative: they do not set requirements and you do not need them to conform.
Scroll sideways to see every column.
| Document | What it gives you | Required |
|---|---|---|
| WCAG 2.2 (the standard) | The success criteria: the testable rules a page passes or fails. | Yes |
| Understanding WCAG 2.2 | One page per criterion: its intent, who it helps, examples and the techniques that meet it. | No |
| Techniques for WCAG 2.2 | Worked ways to meet a criterion (sufficient), ways to go further (advisory), and known failures. | No |
| How to Meet WCAG 2 (Quick Reference) | Every criterion with its techniques, filterable by level and topic. W3C calls it essentially the checklist. | No |
| ACT Rules | Exact test rules, written mainly for people who build testing tools and methods. | No |
Here is how the four fit together for one criterion, the colour contrast rule:
The criterion
1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum), Level AA: text needs a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, large text 3:1.
Understanding
Explains who it helps and that ratios are not rounded: 4.499:1 does not meet 4.5:1.
A sufficient technique
G18 gives a way to meet it: ensure a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 between text and its background.
Your test
Measure the colour pair. Meeting the criterion is what counts, by this technique or any other way.
You can run that last step in our contrast check, and the rule itself is explained in colour contrast requirements explained.
Why Level AA is the working target
No single law says “WCAG” for every website. Each rule a business might answer to names its own version, and all of them stop at Level AA:
What the ADA says
For state and local governments, DOJ's Title II rule (28 CFR 35.200) requires web content and apps to “comply with Level A and Level AA success criteria and conformance requirements specified in WCAG 2.1”. For businesses open to the public, DOJ has no regulation setting detailed web standards; it says businesses have flexibility in how they comply and names WCAG and the Section 508 Standards as helpful guidance.
Federal agencies work to the Section 508 Standards, which use WCAG 2.0 Level A and AA. So the practical target for a small business is WCAG 2.2 Level AA: it covers 2.1 and 2.0 because each version keeps the last one's criteria, and it is the version W3C advises. WCAG 2.2 added nine criteria and removed one, 4.1.1 Parsing; what changed is set out in what changed in WCAG 2.2.
The rules for governments are in the DOJ Title II web rule, the federal ones in what Section 508 is, and what the ADA asks of a private business in ADA compliant website: what the law asks. No federal body certifies a website as ADA compliant: you meet WCAG, test it and, if you choose, say so.
What WCAG 3 is, and what it is not
WCAG 3 is a new standard W3C is still writing. Its full name changes to the W3C Accessibility Guidelines, because it reaches past web pages to apps, tools, publishing and newer technology. The latest Working Draft is dated 10 September 2026, and W3C calls it an incomplete draft that will change; the document itself says it should be cited only as a work in progress.
The draft keeps requirements similar to WCAG 2 but rebuilds the frame around them: outcome statements, core and supplemental requirements, and assertions about the content and about the organisation. Instead of A, AA and AAA, the September 2026 draft has one conformance point, meeting every core requirement, and tags each core requirement by what failing it does to a person (physical harm, risk, a barrier or friction) to report progress in tiers below and above that point. All of that is still under review.
What WCAG 3 is not
- Not a standard yet. W3C does not expect it to be finished for a few more years.
- Not a replacement for WCAG 2 when it arrives. W3C says WCAG 2 will not be deprecated for several years after.
- Not something any US rule we cover points to. Title II names WCAG 2.1; Section 508 names WCAG 2.0.
- Not a reason to wait. W3C's own advice is that the best way to prepare is to meet WCAG 2.2 now.
Where to start on this site
If you have read this far, you know the target: WCAG 2.2 Level AA, tested on full pages. These are the quickest ways in, in a sensible order.
- WCAG 2.2 AA checklistAll 55 Level A and AA criteria, each as a plain test, with a printable record.
- Contrast checkTwo colours in, the ratio out, against 1.4.3 and 1.4.6.
- Alt text checkOne image's alt text checked against what the image does, for 1.1.1.
- Focus order checklistA guided walk with the Tab key: skip link, menu, visible focus, traps.
- How to make a website ADA compliantThe order to do the work in, from a first test to a fixed and recorded site.
If you would rather hire the testing out, the firms that audit against WCAG by hand are compared in WCAG audit services compared, and the official lists of tools and certified testers are in our directory of evaluation tools and auditor lists.
Quick reference
WCAG on one card
- Who writes it: W3C's Web Accessibility Initiative. It is a technical standard, not a law.
- Versions in use: 2.0 (2008), 2.1 (2018), 2.2 (2023). WCAG 3 is a draft.
- Structure: 4 principles, 13 guidelines, 86 success criteria in WCAG 2.2.
- Levels: A, AA, AAA. Level AA in WCAG 2.2 means meeting 55 criteria.
- Required: only the success criteria. Understanding pages and techniques are help, not rules.
- US rules: Title II names WCAG 2.1 AA; Section 508 names WCAG 2.0 AA; Title III businesses get WCAG as guidance.
- Target: WCAG 2.2 Level AA, which also meets 2.1 and 2.0.
This is general information, not legal advice. For your own situation, ask a lawyer.